Alliance warns of 30-hour childcare place 'postcode lottery' following new DfE statistics

Parents in England are facing a 'postcode lottery' for 30-hours funded childcare places, leading early years organisation the Pre-school Learning Alliance has warned after new government statistics revealed huge regional disparities in the number of parents who had been able to access 30-hours places by the beginning of the autumn term.

In order to secure a 30 hours place for their child, parents have to apply for an eligibility code through a government online portal, and then give this code to their childcare provider who, if they are willing to offer a place, will validate it with their local authority to confirm that the parent meets the 30-hour eligibility criteria.

This means that, in order to have their 30 hour code validated, parents need to have found a childcare provider willing to offer them a place.

According to government statistics, as of 5 September, 71% of all codes issued to parents had been validated by childcare providers. However, new local authority level figures, published by children and families minister Robert Goodwill in response to a parliamentary question from Labour MP Lucy Powell, reveal that, as of the same date:

  • 65 out of 153 (42%) local authorities had validated less 30-hours codes than the overall national validation rate of 71%.
  • 47 local authorities had validated less than two-thirds of codes issued to parents, while 14 had validated less than half (this includes North Yorkshire, one of the 30-hour pilot areas, which has been offering the 30 hours since April 2017).
  • Two local authorities (Hammersmith and Fulham, and Kensington and Chelsea) reported having validated no 30-hour codes, despite having issued 180 and 82 codes respectively to parents.

On 12 October, the Department for Education released updated 30-hour validation code statistics which showed that the national validation rate of 9 October had increased to 90%, with the remaining 10% of parents (around 21,000)​ still without a 30-hours place. The government has not published a local authority-level breakdown for those updated figures.

Commenting on the statistics, Neil Leitch, chief executive of the Pre-school Learning Alliance said:

"It's incredibly concerning to see such huge disparities in the numbers of parents able to access 30-hours places across the country, with some local authorities reporting that less than half of parents who have applied for a 30-hours code have subsequently secured a place.

 "We know that the overall national validation rate has continued to rise as the term has progressed, and while this is undoubtedly positive, these new figures show the picture is very different on the ground in many areas, meaning that parents are effectively facing a postcode lottery on places.

 "Add to this the fact that the autumn term is always the quietest term for childcare providers, with the squeeze on places likely to get worse as the year progresses, and it's clear that urgent action needs to be taken to avoid a childcare crisis in some areas of the country.

 "We have long warned that unless the government funds the 30-hour offer adequately, many childcare providers would look to limit the number of funded places on offer â€“​ or in some cases, withdraw from the scheme altogether – meaning less places for parents. With business costs like wages, rents and business rates on the rise while local authority funding rates are set to remain frozen until 2020, this situation is only going to get worse. That's why our Fair Future Funding campaign calls on the government to not only increase early years funding levels, but also to ensure that funding continues to rise in line with the growing cost of delivering funded places in the years to come.

 "The government chose to make this pledge to parents, and so it's up to the government to keep it. This means investing what's needed to ensure that all parents are able to the childcare they were promised, not just the lucky few."

ENDS

LA Name
Eligibility codes issued by 31 August
Codes validated by 5 September
Percentage of eligibility codes validated by 5 September
Hammersmith and Fulham
180
0
0.0%
Kensington and Chelsea
82
0
0.0%
West Sussex
3,493
519
14.9%
Richmond upon Thames
488
151
30.9%
Milton Keynes
1,129
403
35.7%
Merton
611
231
37.8%
Waltham Forest
953
375
39.3%
Manchester
1,308
559
42.7%
North Yorkshire
2,758
1,236
44.8%
Norfolk
2,793
1,296
46.4%
Walsall
895
421
47.0%
No Match
302
147
48.7%
Lewisham
1,151
566
49.2%
Southwark
821
404
49.2%
Tower Hamlets
490
248
50.6%
Wandsworth
626
318
50.8%
York
1,093
598
54.7%
Bexley
814
457
56.1%
Ealing
798
450
56.4%
Surrey
4,262
2,454
57.6%
Hertfordshire
4,800
2,776
57.8%
Leicestershire
3,386
1,988
58.7%
Tameside
1,120
659
58.8%
Lambeth
942
557
59.1%
Central Bedfordshire
1,218
723
59.4%
West Berkshire
669
403
60.2%
Brent
854
517
60.5%
Birmingham
3,621
2,226
61.5%
South Gloucestershire
1,434
882
61.5%
Bracknell Forest
595
366
61.5%
Cambridgeshire
2,612
1,611
61.7%
Sefton
1,339
826
61.7%
Southampton
1,052
650
61.8%
Stoke-on-Trent
1,151
721
62.6%
Harrow
633
397
62.7%
Medway
960
608
63.3%
Windsor and Maidenhead
445
282
63.4%
Enfield
894
567
63.4%
Barnet
1,240
792
63.9%
Derby
1,099
702
63.9%
Worcestershire
2,775
1,788
64.4%
Bristol
2,010
1,299
64.6%
Northamptonshire
3,623
2,359
65.1%
Greenwich
867
570
65.7%
Coventry
1,127
742
65.8%
Middlesbrough
375
249
66.4%
North Somerset
1,010
671
66.4%
Kingston upon Thames
559
374
66.9%
Swindon
1,033
692
67.0%
Essex
4,804
3,235
67.3%
Haringey
805
543
67.5%
Stockton-on-Tees
740
500
67.6%
Derbyshire
3,379
2,297
68.0%
Wakefield
1,333
908
68.1%
Leicester
933
640
68.6%
Slough
546
375
68.7%
Leeds
3,668
2,536
69.1%
Barking and Dagenham
662
460
69.5%
Croydon
1,325
923
69.7%
Bury
1,057
737
69.7%
Redbridge
760
530
69.7%
Oxfordshire
2,555
1,789
70.0%
Peterborough
941
659
70.0%
Hillingdon
896
632
70.5%
Hackney
862
609
70.6%
Hounslow
720
511
71.0%
Gloucestershire
2,614
1,863
71.3%
Shropshire
1,363
973
71.4%
Dorset
1,624
1,164
71.7%
Halton
670
483
72.1%
Thurrock
665
480
72.2%
Isle of Wight
461
333
72.2%
Trafford
1,466
1,059
72.2%
Hampshire
6,095
4,415
72.4%
Nottingham
943
684
72.5%
Blackburn with Darwen
616
452
73.4%
East Sussex
1,676
1,234
73.6%
Blackpool
653
482
73.8%
Stockport
1,725
1,274
73.9%
Barnsley
906
676
74.6%
Kent
5,261
3,930
74.7%
Suffolk
2,572
1,936
75.3%
Sutton
759
572
75.4%
Bedford
725
548
75.6%
Staffordshire
4,116
3,121
75.8%
Cheshire West and Chester
1,803
1,369
75.9%
Bromley
1,163
884
76.0%
Kirklees
1,904
1,449
76.1%
Rotherham
1,105
842
76.2%
Salford
880
672
76.4%
Warwickshire
2,583
1,973
76.4%
Luton
692
531
76.7%
Lincolnshire
3,208
2,462
76.7%
Islington
595
459
77.1%
Newham
806
622
77.2%
Durham
2,209
1,707
77.3%
Somerset
2,467
1,908
77.3%
Oldham
957
742
77.5%
Buckinghamshire
2,065
1,609
77.9%
Doncaster
1,147
895
78.0%
Wolverhampton
691
540
78.1%
Wirral
1,551
1,223
78.9%
Redcar and Cleveland
386
305
79.0%
Sheffield
2,153
1,702
79.1%
Dudley
1,153
913
79.2%
Gateshead
914
724
79.2%
Lancashire
6,221
4,954
79.6%
Poole
723
576
79.7%
St Helens
857
685
79.9%
Havering
1,030
824
80.0%
Plymouth
1,147
923
80.5%
Telford and Wrekin
821
663
80.8%
Southend on Sea
580
471
81.2%
North Lincolnshire
614
499
81.3%
Bradford
2,084
1,700
81.6%
Wiltshire
2,371
1,937
81.7%
Liverpool
1,888
1,549
82.0%
Cornwall
2,208
1,812
82.1%
Westminster
131
108
82.4%
Portsmouth
887
735
82.9%
Bolton
1,464
1,214
82.9%
Wokingham
661
551
83.4%
Calderdale
961
802
83.5%
Knowsley
706
593
84.0%
Northumberland
1,221
1,026
84.0%
Wigan
1,802
1,518
84.2%
North East Lincolnshire
536
453
84.5%
Warrington
1,201
1,019
84.8%
Rochdale
1,066
905
84.9%
Darlington
498
424
85.1%
Solihull
1,017
866
85.2%
Sandwell
972
829
85.3%
Bournemouth
867
742
85.6%
North Tyneside
973
833
85.6%
Kingston upon Hull
1,025
879
85.8%
Camden
386
333
86.3%
Reading
657
567
86.3%
Newcastle upon Tyne
997
862
86.5%
Nottinghamshire
3,841
3,354
87.3%
South Tyneside
558
489
87.6%
Torbay
571
501
87.7%
Cumbria
2,327
2,044
87.8%
Bath and North East Somerset
707
622
88.0%
Sunderland
1,001
884
88.3%
Cheshire East
1,883
1,681
89.3%
Herefordshire
793
708
89.3%
Devon
3,219
2,884
89.6%
Hartlepool
304
274
90.1%
Brighton and Hove
1,096
1,019
93.0%
East Riding of Yorkshire
1,507
1,411
93.6%
Rutland
158
168
106.3%
City of London
16
-
 
Isles of Scilly
13
-
 
  
  • The Pre-school Learning Alliance's Fair Future Funding campaign, which has 5000 provider and parent supporters, is calling for the government to ensure that early years funding increases to cover the rising cost of delivering places. More information is available at  
  • An Alliance survey of nearly 1400 childcare providers conducted in August 2017 found that 42% did not expect that the number of 30-hours places they planned to offer would be enough to meet demand.
 

ABOUT THE ALLIANCE

  • The Pre-school Learning Alliance is the largest and most representative early years membership organisation in England. A registered educational charity, it also provides high-quality affordable childcare and education to support children and families in areas of deprivation throughout the country.
  • The Alliance represents 14,000 member settings and supports them to deliver care and learning to more than 800,000 families every year. We deliver family learning projects, offer information and advice, produce specialist publications, run acclaimed training and accreditation schemes and campaign to influence early years policy and practice.
  •  The Alliance website is