Graduates have positive impact on learning outcomes, EPI says
By Rachel Lawler
Early years practitioners with degrees have a positive impact impact on children鈥檚 learning outcomes, according to a new report from the Education Policy Institute.
The report found that having an early years professional with a degree is associated with a small positive improvement in children鈥檚 attainment. This improvement is sustained as children progress progress, up to Year 6 and the more time children spend in the setting, the stronger the impact.
The EPI argues that the government should extend its 30 hours of funded childcare offer to include all children.
Currently, on average just one practitioner per setting has a degree in private, voluntary and independent early years settings. The EPI is also calling for a government strategy to improve graduate take-up and review early years degrees.
Neil Leitch, chief executive of the Alliance, said: 鈥淲e know that highly-qualified early years staff have a positive impact on child outcomes and it is notable that this report finds that this impact lasts throughout the primary years, rather than fading out earlier on as has been suggested by previous research.
鈥淔or years now, we have called on the government to do more ensure that the early years sector is able to both recruit and retain high-quality practitioners 鈥 both those with degree-level qualifications, and those who may not have a degree but have a wealth of experience and an in-depth knowledge of child development.
鈥淭he fact is that quality costs, and unfortunately, years of government underfunding has left us with a situation where salaries in the sector are among the lowest across all industries and far too many excellent practitioners are making the difficult decision to leave the early years permanently.
鈥淎s such, while we welcome the EPI鈥檚 call on the government to do more to review the quality and qualifications of the early years workforce, without a commitment to invest substantially more into the sector as a whole, such a review will not result in any meaningful change.
鈥淪imilarly, while we recognise the rationale behind the EPI鈥檚 call for an extension to the 30 hours offer to help ensure that those children from more disadvantaged backgrounds benefit from more hours of early education, without a fundamental change to the way that the early years is funded, such a policy could place unsustainable pressure on a sector already struggling to keep its head above water.鈥